Publications

Artificial companions

Subtitle:Empathy and vulnerability mirroring in human-robot relations
Authors/others:Coeckelbergh, Mark (University of Twente)
Abstract:

Under what conditions can robots become companions and what are the ethical issues that might arise in human-robot companionship relations? I argue that the possibility and future of robots as companions depends (among other things) on the robot's capacity to be a recipient of human empathy, and that one necessary condition for this to happen is that the robot mirrors human vulnerabilities. For the purpose of these arguments, I make a distinction between empathy-as-cognition and empathy-as-feeling, connecting the latter to the moral sentiment tradition and its concept of "fellow feeling." Furthermore, I sympathise with the intuition that vulnerability mirroring raises the ethical issue of deception. However, given the importance of appearance in social relations, problems with the concept of deception, and contemporary technologies that question the artificial-natural distinction, we cannot easily justify the underlying assumptions of the deception objection. If we want to hold on to them, we need convincing answers to these problems.

Language:English
Date of publication:12.2010
Journal title:Studies in Ethics, Law, and Technology
Volume:4
Number:3
Peer reviewed:true
Links:
Digital Object Identifier (DOI):http://dx.doi.org/10.2202/1941-6008.1126
Publication Type:Article
Portal:https://ucris.univie.ac.at/portal/en/publications/artificial-companions(95146446-41a6-4662-94a7-f54af979cdc7).html