Publications
LLMs, Truth, and Democracy
- Author(s)
- Mark Coeckelbergh
- Abstract
While there are many public concerns about the impact of AI on truth and knowledge, especially when it comes to the widespread use of LLMs, there is not much systematic philosophical analysis of these problems and their political implications. This paper aims to assist this effort by providing an overview of some truth-related risks in which LLMs may play a role, including risks concerning hallucination and misinformation, epistemic agency and epistemic bubbles, bullshit and relativism, and epistemic anachronism and epistemic incest, and by offering arguments for why these problems are not only epistemic issues but also raise problems for democracy since they undermine its epistemic basis– especially if we assume democracy theories that go beyond minimalist views. I end with a short reflection on what can be done about these political-epistemic risks, pointing to education as one of the sites for change.
- Organisation(s)
- Department of Philosophy
- Journal
- Science and Engineering Ethics
- Volume
- 31
- ISSN
- 1353-3452
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-025-00529-0
- Publication date
- 02-2025
- Peer reviewed
- Yes
- Austrian Fields of Science 2012
- 102001 Artificial intelligence, 506019 Democracy studies
- Keywords
- ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Health(social science), Issues, ethics and legal aspects, Health Policy, Management of Technology and Innovation
- Sustainable Development Goals
- SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
- Portal url
- https://ucrisportal.univie.ac.at/en/publications/9f61b092-e36e-4e0a-8580-0932965da53e